23. 6. 2024

11. Neurorehabilitation of the upper extremity – Immersive virtual reality vs. robot-assisted training. A comparative study

Authors: Kira Lülsdorff, MSc 1, Frederick Benjamin Junker, PhD 2, Bettina Studer, PhD1,2 , Heike Wittenberg, MSc 1, Heidrun Pickenbrock, PhD1 , and Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke, MD 1,2,3

1 Mauritius Hospital and Neurorehabilitation Center Meerbusch, 40670 Meerbusch, Germany

2 Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany

3 Center of Neurology, District Hospital Mainkofen, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany

Background: Severe paresis of the contralesional upper extremity is one of the most common and debilitating post-stroke impairments. The need for cost-effective high-intensity training is driving the development of new technologies, which can complement and extent conventional therapies. Apart from established methods using robotic devices, immersive virtual reality (iVR) systems hold promise to provide cost-efficient high-intensity arm training.

Objective: We investigated whether iVR-based arm training yields at least equivalent effects on upper extremity function as compared to a robot-assisted training in stroke patients with severe arm paresis.

Methods: 52 stroke patients with severe arm paresis received a total of ten daily group therapy sessions over a period of three weeks, which consisted of 20 minutes of conventional therapy and 20 minutes of either robot-assisted (ARMEOSpring®) or iVR-based (CUREO®) arm training. Changes in upper extremity function was assessed using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and user acceptance was measured with the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ).

Results: iVR-based training was not inferior to robot-assisted training. We found that 84% of patients treated with iVR and 50% of patients treated with robot-assisted arm training showed a clinically relevant improvement of upper extremity function. This difference could neither be attributed to differences between the groups regarding age, gender, duration after stroke, affected body side or ARAT scores at baseline, nor to differences in the total amount of therapy provided.

Conclusion: The present study results show that iVR-based arm training seems to be a promising addition to conventional therapy. Potential mechanisms by which iVR unfolds its effects are discussed.

Complete study for download

1. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, et al. Estimates of the Prevalence of Acute Stroke Impairments and Disability in a Multiethnic Population. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1279-1284.

2. Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, Kwakkel G. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):745-750.

3. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181-2186.

4. Cioncoloni D, Martini G, Piu P, et al. Predictors of long-term recovery in complex activities of daily living before discharge from the stroke unit. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(2):217-223.

5. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH, Ket JCF, Heymans MW. Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1482-1488.

6. Morris JH, van Wijck F, Joice S, Donaghy M. Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: the role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(4):291-299.

7. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One. 2014;9(2):e87987.

8. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693-1702.

9. Boccuni L, Marinelli L, Trompetto C, Pascual-Leone A, Tormos Muñoz JM. Time to reconcile research findings and clinical practice on upper limb neurorehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2022;13:939748.

10. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(13-14):823-830.

11. Daly JJ, McCabe JP, Holcomb J, Monkiewicz M, Gansen J, Pundik S. Long-Dose Intensive Therapy Is Necessary for Strong, Clinically Significant, Upper Limb Functional Gains and Retained Gains in Severe/Moderate Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(7):523-537.

12. Krakauer JW, Kitago T, Goldsmith J, et al. Comparing a Novel Neuroanimation Experience to Conventional Therapy for High-Dose Intensive Upper-Limb Training in Subacute Stroke: The SMARTS2 Randomized Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2021;35(5):393-405.

13. Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della Faille M, et al. Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:442.

14. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2008;22(2):111-121. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

15. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(2):171-184.

16. Sale P, Franceschini M, Mazzoleni S, Palma E, Agosti M, Posteraro F. Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2014;11(1):104.

17. Duret C, Hutin E, Lehenaff L, Gracies JM. Do all sub acute stroke patients benefit from robot-assisted therapy? A retrospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(1):57-65.

18. Bertani R, Melegari C, De Cola MC, Bramanti A, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(9):1561-1569.

19. Duret C, Grosmaire AG, Krebs HI. Robot-Assisted Therapy in Upper Extremity Hemiparesis: Overview of an Evidence-Based Approach. Frontiers in Neurology. 2019;10.

20. Slater M. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1535):3549- 3557.

21. Laver KE, Lange B, George S, Deutsch JE, Saposnik G, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(11).

22. Chen J, Or CK, Chen T. Effectiveness of Using Virtual Reality-Supported Exercise Therapy for Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation in Patients With Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(6):e24111.

23. Jin M, Pei J, Bai Z, et al. Effects of virtual reality in improving upper extremity function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2022;36(5):573-596.

24. Mekbib DB, Debeli DK, Zhang L, et al. A novel fully immersive virtual reality environment for upper extremity rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021;1493(1):75-89.

25. Weber LM, Nilsen DM, Gillen G, Yoon J, Stein J. Immersive Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(9):783-788.

26. Ögün MN, Kurul R, Yaşar MF, Turkoglu SA, Avci Ş, Yildiz N. Effect of Leap Motion-based 3D Immersive Virtual Reality Usage on Upper Extremity Function in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2019;77(10):681-688.

27. Crosbie JH, Lennon S, McGoldrick MC, McNeill MD, McDonough SM. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the arm after hemiplegic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(9):798-806.

28. Song YH, Lee HM. Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Bilateral Arm Training in Patients with Chronic Stroke. Brain Sci. 2021;11(8).

29. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386-391.

30. Jin M, Polis A, Hartzel J. Algorithms for minimization randomization and the implementation with an R package. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. 2021;50(10):3077-3087.

31. Rauschenberger M, Schrepp M, Perez-Cota M, Olschner S, Thomaschweski J. Efficient Measurement of the User Experience of Interactive Products. How to use the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ).Example: Spanish Language Version. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence. 2013;2(Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence and Social Application):39-45.

32. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483-492.

33. Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, et al. Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10192):51-62.

34. Gueye T, Dedkova M, Rogalewicz V, Grunerova-Lippertova M, Angerova Y. Early post-stroke rehabilitation for upper limb motor function using virtual reality and exoskeleton: equally efficient in older patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021;55(1):91-96.

35. Rémy-Néris O, Jeannic AL, Dion A, et al. Additional, Mechanized Upper Limb Self- Rehabilitation in Patients With Subacute Stroke: The REM-AVC Randomized Trial. Stroke. 2021;52(6):1938-1947.

36. Taveggia G, Borboni A, Salvi L, et al. Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52(6):767-773.

37. Matamala-Gomez M, Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV. Impact of virtual embodiment and exercises on functional ability and range of motion in orthopedic rehabilitation. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5046.

38. Buetler KA, Penalver-Andres J, Özen Ö, et al. “Tricking the Brain” Using Immersive Virtual Reality: Modifying the Self-Perception Over Embodied Avatar Influences Motor Cortical Excitability and Action Initiation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2022;15.

39. Maier M, Rubio Ballester B, Duff A, Duarte Oller E, Verschure P. Effect of Specific Over Nonspecific VR-Based Rehabilitation on Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Systematic Meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(2):112-129.

Newsletter

Want to stay up to date? Subscribe to our newsletter.

You agree to the processing of personal data.